Category: Sovereignty Rights
Christian Finnish MP persecuted over tweet questioning homosexuality
In 2019, Dr Räsänen posted a tweet questioning her church’s official sponsorship of the Helsinki LGBTQ “Pride 2019” event. She quoted a passage from the Bible, Romans 1:24-27, which clearly denounces the misuse of one’s sexuality. Three criminal charges were filed against her over this tweet, a 2019 radio debate, and a 2004 pamphlet on the church’s teaching on sexuality. The Helsinki District Court issued a unanimous acquittal, but the prosecutors appealed that decision to the Appellate Court. This also unanimously acquitted Päivi from all charges. However, the Prosecutor General didn’t stop there. She asked the Supreme Court for permission to appeal the unanimous acquittal of the Court of Appeal. On April 19, the Supreme Court confirmed that Dr Räsänen would have to stand trial a third time.
Read MoreAccusations surface over Biden Administration’s mistreatment of pro-life activist Heather Idoni
Heather Idoni is amongst several pro-life activists charged or convicted for supposedly violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act that restricts the free speech of pro-life Americans. As reported earlier, the activists, found guilty of violating FACE, potentially face an 11-year prison sentence.
Read MoreMiddle-School Girls Banned from Track Competition for Protesting Trans Sports Policies
On April 18, the girls participated in the Harrison County Middle School Championships. Becky Pepper-Jackson, a 13-year-old boy who identifies as a girl, competed alongside the girls. For years, Pepper-Jackson has been embroiled in a legal battle against West Virginia over a state law that bans males from competing in female sports in public schools. The Fourth Circuit recently ruled in favor of Pepper-Jackson, allowing him to compete in the female category, but the court did not overturn the law altogether.
Read MoreScottish Parliament considers motion to repeal hate speech law amid free speech concerns
Members of the Scottish Parliament have tabled a motion to repeal the new hate crime law that critics view as hostile to free speech. The legal nonprofit ADF International announced in a statement Tuesday that an effort to repeal Scotland’s Hate Crime and Public Order Act was tabled by the Scottish Parliament.
Read MoreUN Commission Adopts Financing for Gender Ideology, Barely
After adoption, Nigeria said it was “distasteful” and “unacceptable” that controversial language was being spread in all UN agreements. She called on the UN system to respect national laws and religious and cultural values.
Read MoreJK Rowling dares police to arrest her for violating new ‘hate crime’ law protecting trans people: ‘DELIBERATELY DEFIANT’
The new law, which only applies to Scotland, “introduces new offences for threatening or abusive behaviour which is intended to stir up hatred based on prejudice towards characteristics including age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity and variations in sex characteristics,” according to the Scottish government.
Read MoreWhy Antifeminism Isn’t Enough
AntiFems face a dilemma. On one hand, they want to affirm, protect, and promote the distinctiveness of women. On the other hand, they oppose what at present seems like the only viable strategy for achieving that end, the recovery and extension of an authentic feminism.
Read MoreJudge upholds Indiana high school’s ban on pro-life student group
An Indiana judge has ruled that Noblesville Schools did not discriminate when a pro-life student club was disallowed from the Noblesville High School (NHS) campus.
Read MoreBeware the new trend of decriminalizing prostitution
The research team I work with is currently knee-deep into categorizing the legal approach that each nation takes with regard to prostitution. This project has really opened my eyes to the wide variety of approaches taken. For example, in some countries, buying sex is perfectly legal but providing that sex for money is strictly illegal. In other cases, we’ve seen countries do abrupt legal U-turns as they discover that the approach they are taking is making things worse.
Read MoreDiversity of thought is at risk in medical journals
It is looking more and more as though the world’s leading medical journals have been captured by the culture of death.
Read More16 AGs demand YouTube drop ‘misleading’ abortion notice from pro-life videos
A coalition of 16 attorneys general has demanded that YouTube remove information labels attached to videos discussing chemical abortions that they argue are “misleading” to viewers.
Read MoreSupreme Court should end government and Big Tech collusion
The Supreme Court will soon hear what may be the most important case of the term, one that epitomizes the broken political culture of our time. Murthy v. Missouri involves, in the words of the district court that first took it up, “the most massive attack against free speech in United States history.” Missouri, Louisiana, and other state, individual, and associational plaintiffs have uncovered substantial evidence of the federal government coercing and otherwise pressuring social media companies to take down constitutionally protected speech.
Read More