Category: Sovereignty Rights

Belgian police arrest protestors over signs criticizing transgender mutilation

On June 5, 2025, Belgian police in Brussels arrested pro-life activist Lois McLatchie Miller and child protection advocate Chris Elston for peacefully holding signs opposing transgender medical procedures for children. Their messages were reflective of common sense views on the subject, such as “Children are never born in the wrong body” and “Children cannot consent to puberty blockers”. This crackdown on free speech raises alarms about the erosion of fundamental rights in Europe, where voicing concerns about radical gender ideology can lead to detention.

Read More

Nebraska Becomes 26th State to Protect Girls and Women’s Sports

Nebraska became the 26th state to protect girls and women’s K-12 and collegiate sports after Governor Jim Pillen signed “The Stand for Women Act” earlier this week. The bill allows for all male, all female and coed teams in school sports. Although many transgender and media activists call such legislation “transgender bans,” these commonsense laws don’t even mention transgenderism. They are grounded in science, defining male and female based on reproductive capacity, not spurious gender ideology.

Read More

Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Straight Woman in Discrimination Case

The Supreme Court unanimously ruled Thursday in favor of a straight woman who sued her employer for discrimination when she was denied promotion and demoted because of her sexual orientation. Ames filed a lawsuit against the agency under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sex, saying she was denied the employment opportunities because she is straight. Both the District Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held Ames failed to meet a heightened evidentiary standard necessary to claim discrimination. Because she is part of the majority group, both courts held Ames would have to provide evidence of background circumstances showing her employer had exhibited a pattern of discrimination against members of majority groups. A minority-group plaintiff would not have to face the same hurdle.

Read More
Loading